It’s a critical resource of curated content in print, online and mobile apps, complete with breaking news streams, interactive features, video, online columns and blogs. and world news, politics, arts, culture, lifestyle, sports, health and more. Winner of 38 Pulitzer Prizes for outstanding journalism, the Journal includes coverage of U.S. While plenty of these publications are seemingly stuck in News+ for the time being thanks to the initial terms of the Texture acquisition (which served as the basis for Apple’s new service), for the sake of securing newcomers with more flexible terms and poaching high-profile holdouts like The New York Times, it seems that Apple should be a bit more transparent to consumers about what all this new news service is and is not.The most ambitious people in the world read The Wall Street Journal. Ī journalist’s thread with a dozen or so retweets won’t achieve the reach that Apple can, and the underlying points embody the frustrations that Apple seemed to implicitly suggest News+ was a total replacement for these publications’ subscriptions when they juxtaposed the massive $8,000 per year slide with the $9.99 monthly price of News+. Most users signing up for News+ likely won’t realize this.ġ/ On this question of whether Apple News+ means you shouldn't subscribe directly to your favorite magazines any longer, here are a few things to think about: still the best way to read ALL that we do every day and every week is to subscribe.
#Discount wall street journal subscription full
The best rundown I’ve seen so far is this newsletter from CNN’s Brian Stelter, which suggests the paper is “trying to have it both ways,” letting News+ users access the full scope of the day’s content through search, though much of it won’t organically surface from Apple’s curation and will only be available for a limited time.
Complicated deal terms don’t make for the prettiest keynote slides, but if consumers are left to make their own assumptions, they’ll likely just assume what Apple has told them is the truth, that they are getting “full access.”Īs a subscriber, how are you supposed to know if your pricier Wall Street Journal digital subscription is any different from what is available on News+? Don’t look for fine print on the Apple News+ landing page, don’t look in the app itself, in fact this information doesn’t seem to be available anywhere in Apple’s communications.
I might have to cancel on WSJ if I can't get a good answer.Īpple doing little to convey what users won’t see when they open the News+ tab is unfortunate, but it’s far more detrimental to publications earnestly looking to expand their user bases, not cannibalize subscriptions.
#Discount wall street journal subscription plus
So what does my $35/month subscription give me that I can't get on Apple News Plus for $9.99/month. Terms were dictated in ways that probably made publishers believe that there wouldn’t be much attrition from core subscription products, but little of that matters when consumer perceptions aren’t managed. News+ is still a great bargain for consumers, but the company has done little to transparently communicate what the service is not.Īpple and individual publications (such as ours) struck their own deals. While it may provide access to most of these publications’ editorial content, due to the curated nature of the platform, it still might be a challenge for you to actually see all of these stories as you scroll and click through the app. The company’s claim that it would cost users $8,000 to get annual access to the publications they are giving readers for $9.99 per month suggests that they see News+ giving consumers the full value of these publications’ subscriptions. Curious whether you should cancel your existing magazine subscription and just subscribe to Apple News+?Īpple certainly seems to believe News+ is an outsized bargain for you.
0 kommentar(er)
